Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 28, ISSUE 2, P333-338, March 2023

Comparison of acromiohumeral distance and glenohumeral internal rotation angle between the empty can test and modified empty can test: “thumb pointing down” versus “elbow pointing laterally”

  • Hwa-ik Yoo
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju City 26493, Republic of Korea

    Laboratory of Kinetic Ergocise Based on Movement Analysis, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Wonju City 26493, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ui-jae Hwang
    Affiliations
    Laboratory of Kinetic Ergocise Based on Movement Analysis, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Wonju City 26493, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sung-hoon Jung
    Affiliations
    Laboratory of Kinetic Ergocise Based on Movement Analysis, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Wonju City 26493, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Young-soo Weon
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju City 26493, Republic of Korea

    Laboratory of Kinetic Ergocise Based on Movement Analysis, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Wonju City 26493, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Oh-yun Kwon
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Fax: +82 33 760 2496.
    Affiliations
    Laboratory of Kinetic Ergocise Based on Movement Analysis, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Wonju City 26493, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 27, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2021.12.005

      Abstract

      Background

      During the empty can test, the direction of the thumb (downward) has been widely used as an instruction for producing glenohumeral internal rotation. However, the combination of forearm pronation and thumb motion as a compensatory movement could contribute to the lack of glenohumeral internal rotation during the empty can test. This study aimed to compare the glenohumeral internal rotation angle between the conventional empty can (with thumb direction) and modified empty can tests (with elbow direction), as well as the acromiohumeral distance between the full can, conventional empty can, and modified empty can tests.

      Methods

      In this laboratory study, we measured the glenohumeral internal rotation angle using a motion sensor and the acromiohumeral distance using ultrasonography during the following tests: full can test (thumb pointing up), conventional empty can test (thumb pointing down), and modified empty can test (elbow pointing laterally) in 20 healthy subjects.

      Results

      Compared with the conventional empty can test, the glenohumeral internal rotation angle was significantly greater during the modified empty can test (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the acromiohumeral distance measured in the modified empty can test was significantly less than that in the full can test (p < 0.001) and conventional empty can test (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in the acromiohumeral distance between the full can test and the conventional empty can test (p > 0.017).

      Conclusions

      During the empty can test, the instructions should be given to patients based on the elbow direction (elbow pointing laterally). The modified empty can test can produce full glenohumeral internal rotation, compared with instructions based on the thumb direction (thumb pointing down). Consequently, the modified empty can test can produce a more decreased subacromial space.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Orthopaedic Science
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • van der Windt D.A.
        • Koes B.W.
        • de Jong B.A.
        • Bouter L.M.
        Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Dec; 54: 959-964
        • Juel N.G.
        • Natvig B.
        Shoulder diagnoses in secondary care, a one year cohort.
        BMC Muscoskel Disord. 2014 Mar; 15: 1-8
        • Ostör A.J.K.
        • Richards C.A.
        • Prevost A.T.
        • Speed C.A.
        • Hazleman B.L.
        Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care.
        Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jun; 44: 800-805
        • Kalra N.
        • Seitz A.L.
        • Boardman 3rd, N.D.
        • Michener L.A.
        Effect of posture on acromiohumeral distance with arm elevation in subjects with and without rotator cuff disease using ultrasonography.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Oct; 40: 633-640
        • Timmons M.K.
        • Lopes-Albers A.D.
        • Borgsmiller L.
        • Zirker C.
        • Ericksen J.
        • Michener L.A.
        Differences in scapular orientation, subacromial space and shoulder pain between the full can and empty can tests.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Apr; 28: 395-401
        • Park S.W.
        • Chen Y.T.
        • Thompson L.
        • Kjoenoe A.
        • Juul-Kristensen B.
        • Cavalheri V.
        • McKenna L.
        No relationship between the acromiohumeral distance and pain in adults with subacromial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Sci Rep. 2020 Nov; 10: 20611
        • Michener L.A.
        • Walsworth M.K.
        • Doukas W.C.
        • Murphy K.P.
        Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov; 90: 1898-1903
        • Jobe F.W.
        • Moynes D.R.
        Delineation of diagnostic criteria and a rehabilitation program for rotator cuff injuries.
        Am J Sports Med. 1982 Nov; 10: 336-339
        • De Wilde L.
        • Plasschaert F.
        • Berghs B.
        • Van Hoecke M.
        • Verstraete K.
        • Verdonk R.
        Quantified measurement of subacromial impingement.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug; 12: 346-349
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Kadrmas W.R.
        • Speer K.P.
        The manual muscle examination for rotator cuff strength: an electromyographic investigation.
        Am J Sports Med. 1996 Sep; 24: 581-588
        • Thigpen C.A.
        • Padua D.A.
        • Morgan N.
        • Kreps C.
        • Karas S.G.
        Scapular kinematics during supraspinatus rehabilitation exercise: a comparison of full-can versus empty-can techniques.
        Am J Sports Med. 2006 Apr; 34: 644-652
        • Magee D.J.
        • Manske R.C.
        Orthopedic physical assessment.
        6th ed. Elsevier, Missouri2014
        • Yoo H.I.
        • Hwang U.J.
        • Ahn S.H.
        • Gwak G.T.
        • Kwon O.Y.
        Comparison of pelvic rotation angle in the transverse plane in the supine position and during active straight leg raise between people with and without nonspecific low back pain.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2021 Mar; 83: 105310
        • Timmons M.K.
        • Ericksen J.J.
        • Yesilyaprak S.S.
        • Michener L.A.
        Empty can exercise provokes more pain and has undesirable biomechanics compared with the full can exercise.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Apr; 25: 548-556
        • Boettcher C.E.
        • Ginn K.A.
        • Cathers I.
        The 'empty can' and 'full can' tests do not selectively activate supraspinatus.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Jul; 12: 435-439
        • Boer P.H.
        • Moss S.J.
        Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores of twelve functional fitness tests in adults with Down syndrome.
        Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jan; 48: 176-185
        • Neumann D.A.
        Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: foundations for physical rehabilitation.
        2nd. Mosby, St. Louis2010
        • Graichen H.
        • Bonél H.
        • Stammberger T.
        • Englmeier K.H.
        • Reiser M.
        • Eckstein F.
        Subacromial space width changes during abduction and rotation-a 3-D MR imaging study.
        Surg Radiol Anat. 1999 May; 21: 59-64
        • Seitz A.L.
        • McClure P.W.
        • Finucane S.
        • Ketchum J.M.
        • Walsworth M.K.
        • Boardman N.D.
        • Michener L.A.
        The scapular assistance test results in changes in scapular position and subacromial space but not rotator cuff strength in subacromial impingement.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 May; 42: 400-412
        • McCully S.P.
        • Kumar N.
        • Lazarus M.D.
        • Karduna A.R.
        Internal and external rotation of the shoulder: effects of plane, end-range determination, and scapular motion.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec; 14: 602-610
        • Borich M.R.
        • Bright J.M.
        • Lorello D.J.
        • Cieminski C.J.
        • Buisman T.
        • Ludewig P.M.
        Scapular angular positioning at end range internal rotation in cases of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Dec; 36: 926-934
        • Ludewig P.M.
        • Phadke V.
        • Braman J.P.
        • Hassett D.R.
        • Cieminski C.J.
        • LaPrade R.F.
        Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation.
        J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2009 Feb; 91: 378-389
        • Lawrence R.L.
        • Braman J.P.
        • Ludewig P.M.
        Shoulder kinematics impact subacromial proximities: a review of the literature.
        Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 May - Jun; 24: 219-230
        • Longo S.
        • Corradi A.
        • Michielon G.
        • Sardanelli F.
        • Sconfienza L.M.
        Ultrasound evaluation of the subacromial space in healthy subjects performing three different positions of shoulder abduction in both loaded and unloaded conditions.
        Phys Ther Sport. 2017 Jan; 23: 105-112
        • Tasaki A.
        • Nimura A.
        • Nozaki T.
        • Yamakawa A.
        • Niitsu M.
        • Morita W.
        • Hoshikawa Y.
        • Akita K.
        Quantitative and qualitative analyses of subacromial impingement by kinematic open MRI.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 May; 23: 1489-1497
        • Graichen H.
        • Bonél H.
        • Stammberger T.
        • Englmeier K.H.
        • Reiser M.
        • Eckstein F.
        Sex-specific differences of subacromial space width during abduction, with and without muscular activity, and correlation with anthropometric variables.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Mar-Apr; 10: 129-135
        • Schmidt W.A.
        • Schmidt H.
        • Schicke B.
        • Gromnica-Ihle E.
        Standard reference values for musculoskeletal ultrasonography.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Aug; 63: 988-994
        • Wang H.K.
        • Lin J.J.
        • Pan S.L.
        • Wang T.G.
        Sonographic evaluations in elite college baseball athletes.
        Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2005 Feb; 15: 29-35
        • Werner C.M.
        • Conrad S.J.
        • Meyer D.C.
        • Keller A.
        • Hodler J.
        • Gerber C.
        Intermethod agreement and interobserver correlation of radiologic acromiohumeral distance measurements.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr; 17: 237-240
        • McCreesh K.M.
        • Crotty J.M.
        • Lewis J.S.
        Acromiohumeral distance measurement in rotator cuff tendinopathy: is there a reliable, clinically applicable method? A systematic review.
        Br J Sports Med. 2015 Mar; 49: 298-305