Advertisement
Original Article|Articles in Press

4D-foot analysis on effect of arch support on ankle, subtalar, and talonavicular joint kinematics

Published:January 27, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2022.10.009

      Abstract

      Background

      It has been difficult to study the effects of arch support on multiple joints simultaneously. Herein, we evaluated foot and ankle kinematics using a fully automated analysis system, “4D-Foot,” consisting of a biplane X-ray imager and two-dimensional‒three-dimensional registration, with automated image segmentation and landmark detection tools.

      Methods

      We evaluated the effect of arch support on ankle, subtalar, and talonavicular joint kinematics in five healthy female volunteers without a clinical history of foot and ankle disorders. Computed tomography images of the foot and ankle and X-ray videos of walking barefoot and with arch support were acquired. A kinematic analysis using the “4D-Foot” system was performed. The ankle, subtalar, and talonavicular joint kinematics were quantified from heel-strike to foot-off, with and without arch support.

      Results

      For the ankle joint, significant differences were observed in dorsi/plantarflexion, inversion/eversion, and internal/external rotation in the late midstance phase. The dorsi/plantarflexion and inversion/eversion motions were smaller with arch support. For the subtalar joint, a significant difference was observed in all the dynamic motions in the heel-strike and late midstance phases. For the talonavicular joint, significant differences were observed in inversion/eversion and internal/external rotation in heel-strike and the late midstance phases. For the subtalar and talonavicular joints, the motion was larger with arch support. An extremely strong correlation was observed when the motion of the subtalar and talonavicular joints was compared for each condition and motion.

      Conclusions

      The results indicated that the arch support decreased the ankle motion and increased the subtalar and talonavicular joint motions. Additionally, our study demonstrated that the in vivo subtalar and talonavicular joints revealed a strong correlation, suggesting that the navicular and calcaneal bones were moving similarly to the talus and that the arch support stabilizes the ankle joint and compensatively increases the subtalar and talonavicular joint motions.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Orthopaedic Science
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • MacWilliams B.A.
        • Cowley M.
        • Nicholson D.E.
        Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait.
        Gait Posture. 2003 Jun; 17 (PubMed PMID: 12770635): 214-224
        • Maslen B.A.
        • Ackland T.R.
        Radiographic study of skin displacement errors in the foot and ankle during standing.
        Clin Biomech. 1994 Sep; 9 (PubMed PMID: 23916297): 291-296
        • Nichols J.A.
        • Roach K.E.
        • Fiorentino N.M.
        • Anderson A.E.
        Predicting tibiotalar and subtalar joint angles from skin-marker data with dual-fluoroscopy as a reference standard.
        Gait Posture. 2016 Sep; 49 (PubMed PMID: 27414041): 136-143
        • de Asla R.J.
        • Wan L.
        • Rubash H.E.
        • Li G.
        Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.
        J Orthop Res. 2006 May; 24 (PubMed PMID: 16609963): 1019-1027
        • Peltz C.D.
        • Haladik J.A.
        • Hoffman S.E.
        • McDonald M.
        • Ramo N.L.
        • Divine G.
        • et al.
        Effects of footwear on three-dimensional tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion during running.
        J Biomech. 2014 Aug 22; 47 (PubMed PMID: 24957924): 2647-2653
        • Campbell K.J.
        • Wilson K.J.
        • LaPrade R.F.
        • Clanton T.O.
        Normative rearfoot motion during barefoot and shod walking using biplane fluoroscopy.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr; 24 (PubMed PMID: 24902926): 1402-1408
        • Roach K.E.
        • Wang B.
        • Kapron A.L.
        • Fiorentino N.M.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        • Bo Foreman K.
        • et al.
        In vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints in asymptomatic subjects: a high-speed dual fluoroscopy study.
        J Biomech Eng. 2016 Sep 1; (PubMed PMID: 27455417): 138
        • Balsdon M.
        • Dombroski C.
        • Bushey K.
        • Jenkyn T.R.
        Hard, soft and off-the-shelf foot orthoses and their effect on the angle of the medial longitudinal arch: a biplane fluoroscopy study.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Jun; 43 (PubMed PMID: 30762477): 331-338
        • Lenz A.L.
        • Nichols J.A.
        • Roach K.E.
        • Foreman K.B.
        • Barg A.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        • et al.
        Compensatory motion of the subtalar joint following tibiotalar arthrodesis: an in vivo dual-fluoroscopy imaging study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Apr 1; 102 (PubMed PMID: 32079879): 600-608
        • Lenz A.L.
        • Strobel M.A.
        • Anderson A.M.
        • Fial A.V.
        • MacWilliams B.A.
        • Krzak J.J.
        • et al.
        Assignment of local coordinate systems and methods to calculate tibiotalar and subtalar kinematics: a systematic review.
        J Biomech. 2021 May 7; 120 (PubMed PMID: 33744722)110344
        • Canton S.
        • Anderst W.
        • Hogan M.V.
        In vivo ankle kinematics revealed through biplane radiography: current concepts, recent literature, and future directions.
        Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Feb; 13 (PubMed PMID: 31989528): 77-85
        • Mizoe S.
        • Otake Y.
        • Miyamoto T.
        • Soufi M.
        • Nakao S.
        • Tanaka Y.
        • et al.
        4D-foot: a fully automated pipeline of four-dimensional analysis of the foot bones using bi-plane X-ray video and CT.
        Med Image Comput Assist Interv MICCAI. 2021; ([Chapter 18]): 182-192
        • Hoffman S.E.
        • Peltz C.D.
        • Haladik J.A.
        • Divine G.
        • Nurse M.A.
        • Bey M.J.
        Dynamic in-vivo assessment of navicular drop while running in barefoot, minimalist, and motion control footwear conditions.
        Gait Posture. Mar. 2015; 41 (PubMed PMID: 25791869): 825-829
        • Chen Y.C.
        • Lou S.Z.
        • Huang C.Y.
        • Su F.C.
        Effects of foot orthoses on gait patterns of flat feet patients.
        Clin Biomech. 2010 Mar; 25 (PubMed PMID: 20015581): 265-270
        • Zhao X.
        • Wang M.
        • Fekete G.
        • Baker J.S.
        • Wiltshire H.
        • Gu Y.
        Analyzing the effect of an arch support functional insole on walking and jogging in young, healthy females.
        Technol Health Care. 2021; 29 (PubMed PMID: 30452428): 1141-1151
        • Hollander K.
        • Zech A.
        • Rahlf A.L.
        • Orendurff M.S.
        • Stebbins J.
        • Heidt C.
        The relationship between static and dynamic foot posture and running biomechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Gait Posture. 2019 Jul; 72 (PubMed PMID: 31195310): 109-122
        • Jiang H.
        • Sun D.
        • Jampani V.
        • Yang M.
        • Learned-Miller E.
        • Kautz J.
        • et al.
        Super SloMo: high quality estimation of multiple intermediate frames for video interpolation.
        2018: 9000-9008
        • Mathis A.
        • Mamidanna P.
        • Cury K.M.
        • Abe T.
        • Murthy V.N.
        • Mathis M.W.
        • et al.
        DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning.
        Nat Neurosci. 2018 Sep; 21 (PubMed PMID: 30127430): 1281-1289
        • Wang B.
        • Roach K.E.
        • Kapron A.L.
        • Fiorentino N.M.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        • Singer M.
        • et al.
        Accuracy and feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to measure in vivo ankle arthrokinematics.
        Gait Posture. 2015 May; 41 (PubMed PMID: 25864769): 888-893
        • Brown J.A.
        • Gale T.
        • Anderst W.
        An automated method for defining anatomic coordinate systems in the hindfoot.
        J Biomech. 2020 Aug 26; 109 (PubMed PMID: 32807312)109951
        • Fukano M.
        • Fukubayashi T.
        • Banks S.A.
        Sex differences in three-dimensional talocrural and subtalar joint kinematics during stance phase in healthy young adults.
        Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Oct; 61 (PubMed PMID: 30086450): 117-125
        • Phan C.B.
        • Shin G.
        • Lee K.M.
        • Koo S.
        Skeletal kinematics of the midtarsal joint during walking: midtarsal joint locking revisited.
        J Biomech. 2019 Oct 11; 95 (PubMed PMID: 31431345)109287
        • Ledoux W.R.
        • Sangeorzan B.J.
        Clinical biomechanics of the peritalar joint.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2004 Dec; 9 (v. PubMed PMID: 15498699): 663-683
        • Taniguchi A.
        • Tanaka Y.
        • Takakura Y.
        • Kadono K.
        • Maeda M.
        • Yamamoto H.
        Anatomy of the spring ligament.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Nov; 85 (PubMed PMID: 14630849): 2174-2178
        • Fong D.T.P.
        • Lue K.B.K.
        • Chung M.M.L.
        • Chu V.W.S.
        • Yung P.S.H.
        An individually moulded insole with 5-mm medial arch support reduces peak impact and loading at the heel after a one-hour treadmill run.
        Gait Posture. 2020 Oct; 82 (PubMed PMID: 32911096): 90-95
        • Peng H.T.
        • Lin C.H.
        • Kuo Y.C.
        • Song C.Y.
        Effects of arch support insoles on single- and dual-task gait performance among community-dwelling older adults.
        Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Aug 10; 15 (PubMed PMID: 32848373): 1325-1332
        • Braga U.M.
        • Mendonça L.D.
        • Mascarenhas R.O.
        • Alves C.O.A.
        • Filho R.G.T.
        • Resende R.A.
        Effects of medially wedged insoles on the biomechanics of the lower limbs of runners with excessive foot pronation and foot varus alignment.
        Gait Posture. 2019 Oct; 74 (PubMed PMID: 31574408): 242-249